Here's how much money Pennsylvania counties would see from the $26B opioid settlement
Pennsylvania counties are expected by Jan. 2 to decide whether to join a $26 billion settlement with four companies that distributed or made some of the prescription drugs that fueled the deadly opioid crisis.
Over the next 18 years, the commonwealth could see as much as $1 billion of that money, according to terms of the multi-state settlement with Cardinal, McKesson, AmerisourceBergen and Johnson & Johnson. That includes as much as $232 million in 2022.
Seventy percent of the funds are slated to go to county authorities. Counties that sign the settlement agreement could get an infusion of money by April intended to be used to help prevent opioid addiction and assist those living with it.
In Dauphin County, that amounts to $2.6 million in 2022, according to a WITF analysis of data from the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General. Over 18 years, the county would get $11.2 million.
Dauphin County Commissioners signed the settlement last Wednesday, according to county spokesman Brett Hambright. It’s “too early to say for certain” precisely where the funds will be spent, said Hambright.
York County officials also signed the agreement, according to the county solicitor’s office, but declined to say how funds will be spent. York County would receive $4.1 million in 2022 and $17.9 million over 18 years.
Lancaster County is expecting $3.7 in 2022 and about $15.8 million over the next two decades. Commissioners signed the agreement last week, said Lancaster County Chairman Joshua Parsons. The Lancaster County Board of Commissioners will control the funds.
“We understand there are certain defined categories for which it can be used,” Parsons said. Decisions on how to spend the money “have not been made yet as it is still early in the process and it is not yet clear when the funds will arrive.”
“We will be having further public discussions at our public meetings as we get more detail,” Parsons said. “We certainly will look for input from the public and community stakeholders.”
Counties can decide who is in charge of the funds, and have broad authority on how to spend them, said Pennsylvania Executive Deputy Attorney General James Donahue. However, the money must go toward approved uses.
“That’s their responsibility, and ultimately they have to answer to their community about where they spend that money,” Donahue said.
Medication assisted treatment, the overdose-reversing drug naloxone and services for pregnant women and new mothers living with opioid use disorder are a few of the approved uses for the money laid out in the settlement.
Prevention campaigns, syringe service programs and “warm handoff” services to route people addicted to opioids from emergency departments into recovery programs are also among the approved uses.
Prisons and jails are also approved to get funding to provide treatment for people with opioid use disorder, potentially paying for expensive trips to hospital emergency departments. Like many of the approved uses, this one stemmed from feedback from county commissioners, Donahue said.
“They were facing very large expenses where somebody commits a crime, it’s a drug related crime, they get into the county prison, and they either are in the throes of an overdose or they begin suffering withdrawal,” Donahue said.
A 13-person board of trustees will review how counties use the money, Donahue said. If county officials were to misuse the money or fail to report how it was spent, the board could penalize them by withholding funds in subsequent years.
When it comes to helping people with addiction, routing money directly to counties is potentially both “a blessing and a curse,” according to public health scholar Joshua Sharfstein.
“So the blessing part is that counties have a really good sense of the problem that they’re facing, and can target resources to programs, to needs, to populations that really need help,” said Sharfstein, who is vice dean of the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The potential “curse,” he said, is that counties are subject to the winds of politics — and county leaders can end up using the money on things that may be politically popular but that don’t fit with best practices.
This is something that happened on the state level with the massive tobacco lawsuits of the 1980s, Sharfstein noted. Money that was supposed to help people affected by smoking went to paving roads and other unrelated purposes in some states.
Sharfstein said he hopes counties around the U.S. will follow five recommendations proposed by a panel of groups that study addiction:
“Spend the money to save lives — don’t bank it or pay yourself back,” Sharfstein said. “Use evidence to guide the spending. Invest in youth prevention for tomorrow. Focus on racial equity because of some of the injustices of the past. And finally, develop a fair and transparent process for deciding where to spend the funding.”
District attorneys in Allegheny, Philadelphia and Erie counties oppose the settlement.
Philadelphia is estimated to get $161 million over 18 years, according to the Attorney General’s Office. Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner said that, given the damage opioid addiction has done, that is not nearly enough.
He compared it to the tobacco companies settlement of the 1980s, which he said would be $500 billion if it were adjusted for inflation today. In contrast, the opioid settlement is less than 18% of that amount.
The Attorney General’s office has noted that there is no guarantee of money ever reaching communities that file their own lawsuits.
Krasner has sued the attorney general in what’s known as a “deck action” — making the case that his office has the independent right to file consumer protection actions against the companies, separate from anything the state does.
“We brought a legal action to make it clear we have an independent right to pursue remedies,” he said.
County by county
Fifteen percent of the $1 billion will go to the state. Another 15% is set aside for counties or towns that pursued legal actions against the four companies. This analysis does not include that money. For example, York County is set to receive a nearly $3 million allocation from this fund.
The remaining $700 million is divided among counties based on a formula that includes overdose deaths, opioid-related hospitalizations, an estimate of how many opioids were prescribed and and how many times the overdose-reversing drug naloxone was administered.
These numbers are based on Office of Attorney General data and analysis of that data.
This analysis does not subtract funds that will be deducted for attorney’s fees — estimated to be about 6.6% or $70 million.
Each county gets a minimum of $1 million.
Read more from our partners, WITF.