Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Contact 90.5 WESA with a story idea or news tip:

Is It Time To Re-Evaluate PA's Vehicle Emission Tests?

Amy Sisk
Scott Reynolds, owner of Express Transmission in Beaver County, shows an array of gas cap adapters. The adapters are used as a part of Pennsylvania's vehicle emission testing program.

Millions of Pennsylvania drivers make an annual trip to their local auto shop to test their vehicle’s emissions. Two decades after this ritual began, some are questioning its necessity.

Emission tests are required in25 of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties. They exist to reduce smog and serve to help the state comply with the federal Clean Air Act.

State Sen. Elder Vogel (R-New Sewickley) represents three counties, but emissions tests are required in only one, Beaver County. He said he wonders whether that’s fair to those residents, given that dirty air doesn’t stop at the county line.

“It’s just a $30, $40, $50 cost that everybody has to have once a year that we don’t believe is necessary anymore,” he said.

Emission controls are better on newer cars, he said. Plus, most vehicles pass. Statewide, the failure rate is below 3 percent, according to the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.

Vogel pushed legislation last year to study the program, along with Sen. Wayne Langerholc (R-Richland). Langerholc’s district includes Cambria County, which once fell short of federal ozone standards, but its designation changed in 2008.

“We are compliant,” he said. “Yet our county and our citizens are still burdened with this oppressive regulation that hits their pocketbooks.”

To carry out the study, the Joint State Government Commission has convened state officials and people who have a background in auto emissions testing and regulations. The group will look at the implications of ending the vehicle emission testing program for some of the state’s less populated counties. Their work is scheduled to wrap up this fall.

Emissions tests vary by a vehicle’s age and location, but they typically involve testing a car’s gas cap to make sure it’s venting properly. Shops also connect to the vehicle’s computer to look for any codes indicating a problem with the emission controls.

There’s still a way for polluting cars to stay on the road. Drivers must attempt to fix a vehicle that has failed, but if they put $150 worth of work into repairing the problem and it still fails, they can receive a one-year waiver.

Removing counties from the emission testing program requires more than a simple policy change or a new law. The federal Environmental Protection Agency has to sign off.

“If we do end it, we would have to back-fill it with something else to make up the lost emission savings,” said Rob Altenburg, director of the PennFuture Energy Center.

He used to work for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, but the environmental group he now represents sued the state in the early 2000s to make sure the state implemented an adequate program to meet federal requirements.

While ending the program is not the right move, he said he would be open to discussing changes. Even though most cars pass, he said the tests play an important role. Without them, people have less incentive to fix emissions-related problems on their vehicles.

“What you need is a program to make sure you do capture these high-emitting vehicles, because one high-emitting vehicle can emit an awful lot of emissions” he said.

A spokesperson for the DEP wrote in an email that it’s difficult to determine the effectiveness of the program because the state cannot measure the emissions from each vehicle.

“DEP believes the emissions inspection program is important to its mission of protecting clean air of the commonwealth and public health, particularly in urban areas with significant numbers of vehicles,” spokesperson Neil Shader said.

Some groups would like a more solid answer as to whether the program is working.

Ted Leonard, executive director of the Pennsylvania AAA Federation, is part of the group studying the potential elimination of the requirement in certain counties.

“I think the program being two decades old needs to be looked at and see if there are some things we that can fine-tune,” he said.

Credit Amy Sisk / WESA
Express Transmission owner Scott Reynolds, left, works alongside his son, also named Scott Reynolds, on a vehicle at their Beaver County shop.

For some auto shops, the emissions tests are lucrative. The shops keep most of the money and pay a small fee to a vendor. The state does not collect any revenue from the program.

Scott Reynolds owns Express Transmission in Monaca, Pa. He said transmission repairs make up the bulk of his Beaver County business, but he does up to 10 emission tests per month on the side. While his shop might not take a big hit if the program were to disappear, he said others down the road run several hundred tests a month.

“I love these guys, they are great friends of mine and this is how they feed their family,” he said.

For their sake, he would like the program to stick around. But for his own business, he said he would be OK if it ended because, like all shop owners, he has to deal with upkeep.

This is particularly troublesome in Philadelphia, where shops run an additional tailpipe test on a small number of older cars, said Ross Colket, president of the Automotive Service Association of Pennsylvania.

He said he would like to see that requirement change. 

“Many of the companies that actually made those machines have gone out of business, and in some cases, if there’s a major failure, the owners of the machines cannot get parts,” he said.

But Colket said he opposes what study is proposing to do: end the entire emission testing program in certain counties, as doing so has the potential to further hurt air quality, especially in urban areas.

Soon, the shops like the ones Colket represents will have to get new equipment to keep the tests going. Their technology is outdated, according to PennDOT.

Reynolds is afraid that will cost him more than $10,000.

“I just can’t do it with this size of a shop,” he said. “I’m not big enough to incur those costs.”

He might decide to get out of the program anyway, regardless of what the state decides to do.